After attending the getMETAsmart event in San Francisco last week I became curious how photographers who read my blog and/or follow me on Twitter use it. To be honest I’d be even more curious how photo buyers or stock agents actually use metadata on a daily basis, but that will have to wait for another post. Metadata as many of you know is often discussed but rarely so in the context of how real people use it. While hearing about best practices is helpful everyone has a slightly different take on the subject and many address metadata differently in their workflow. Let’s first address the “why”. Why should metadata play a role in your workflow? To answer that I’ve combined my understanding of metadata with feedback received from my Twitter followers. Read on to learn more.
1. Photographer Attribution & Contact Info
Metadata provides you the means to identify yourself as the photographer behind the photograph. If for any reason your photograph is used with out proper attribution a view of the metadata embedded in the photograph will reveal your identity and how to contact you.
@willbl: …contact details in case image goes walkies & someone wants to find out who it belongs to
@ajlmarques: …also contact info (site, email, phone)
2. Copyright
On the legal front specifying Copyright information in your metadata informs others what copyright terms are assigned to your photograph. As with watermarks, embedding this data discloses copyright terms to others. In the event of copyright infringement one question asked will be if you the photographer made clear the photograph was copyrighted. Between watermarks and embedded copyright info you should be more than covered.
@thatchrisbrown I have LR add copyright metadata during import…
@kwm: Routinely populate fields related to copyright…
@scuba_suzy i’ve set my camera up to fill in the copyright metadata because I kept forgetting to do in it adobe bridge.
3. Keywords
Newer software applications targeting photographers are now addressing the need of document access management (DAM). Lightroom is among the most popular and while not a true DAM solution it provides a solid low cost solution for photographers. Being able to query a database of images improves a photographers productivity. While keywording isn’t the most exciting task the effort can be streamlined and even automated.
@thatchrisbrown …uses keywords with smart collections in Lightroom
@raminm use metadata to easily find many of the pictures he needs
@stevelfko metadata is important for finding images next year
4. Licensing Notes
Another solid use of metadata is to attach licensing information in your image. This saves you the time of referencing separate documentation that can easily get misplaced. While this isn’t an end all solution it is another example of storing data with the image in ways that can save you and your clients time.
@enlightphoto not only enters copyright and creator info but includes special instructions or rights if sold
5. Anticipation of the Orphan Works Legislation
Interestingly enough no one mentioned using metadata in anticipation of the Orphan Works Legislation (OWL). While the OWL hasn’t been at the forefront of news recently thanks to the economic crisis it’s important to not lose sight of it. Consistently employing metadata now will in the end save you time as requirements surrounding this legislation are defined. Metadata will likely be a central component to future OWL legislation to identify photos and/or to transfer data to registries upon submission. The jury is still out on what will be required but best to think long-term
Recommended Reading
Photographer Phil Colla (@philcolla on Twitter) recently posted an incredibly detailed article about his approach to metadata
Be sure to check it out…
Metadata, Photography and Workflow for the Web
[tags]Photography, Metadata, Workflow[/tags]
Pingback: getMETAsmart DC | DC Shutterbugs - news & info for photographers in the DC metro area
I replied as raminm, so you could probably add some data.
In Lightroom I automatically set Copyright information and shooting location data on import (of location isn’t the default I change it immediately after the import).
With pictures that find their way to our gallery I might also set the title (which the gallery software utilizes automatically).
Thanks for an interesting article Jim, but the one problem with using metadata with respect to the Orphan Works Legislation (and generally) is that it can so easily be removed 🙁 The metadata on a photo can easily be removed by a malicious individual with an automated process across hundreds of photos. I tend to put my name actually on the photo in photoshop as well (as part of my PP) so that if anyone wanted to infringe the photo they would have to remove my copyright from both metadata (which can be automated) AND by changing the photo itself (cropping out the name etc) which would probably have to be done manually per photo. This is something you do anyway on your photos, but its something for everyone to think about going forward. It’s actually the reason that I’m put off from joining 1x.com because they don’t allow photos with text.
@scuba_suzy
Thanks Jim!
I already do 1 and 2 but hadn’t though of #4 – I will start doing that!
Pingback: SDuffyPhotography.blog » Blog Archive » Friday Link Love – 06/26/09
Pingback: Some photo link-love goodness.. | Chuqui 3.0
Pingback: EXIF and Beyond: David Riecks » JMG-Galleries – Jim M. Goldstein Photography
Pingback: 10 Must Read Copyright Articles for Photographers | Alabama Portrait Photographer - Jerrell Terrell