It’s been interesting to see how people are operating in relation to Copyright versus Creative Commons. Brian Auer ran a counter point article to my Creative Commons: A Great Concept, I’ll Never Employ article and received 500+ Diggs to my 10 Diggs. Yet according to my poll (see below) the vast majority (68%) of respondents are leveraging a straight “All Rights Reserved” license. Brian also ran an equivalent poll and did a great job of evaluating his results. The combined results comprised of 145 votes yielded a 65% of respondents leveraging a straight “All Rights Reserved” license.
It just goes to show you when all is said and done the majority of photographers reading our blogs are rightly conservative when it comes to protecting their work.
I’m curious if there’s a way to find out how many Flickr images are licensed under each option — that would provide a pretty good comparison to our polls. It seems like more than 2/3 use all rights reserved on Flickr…
Brian you can find that out on this page:
http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/
November 13th Flickr had their 2 Billionth image submitted.
The following site has figured out that 920,200 photos are uploaded daily to Flickr.
http://blog.forret.com/2006/10/a-picture-a-day-flickrs-storage-growth/
Based on these numbers as of today the following stats would apply:
Click to enlarge
Call me an altruistic fool, but I believe in giving back to the the taxpayers what their money has given me: This park.
Tax dollars provided the infrastructure that enables me to live here, to get to other places, to be able to work; Tax dollars enabled me to learn to read my camera manual via public schools.
I limit my CC license to attribution/non-commercial; I’ve been approached by for-profit companies who’ve wanted my images for their publications; They get paid advertising, so they sure as heck should be able to pay me for the effort I expend to get the shots.
I really have no problem with folks printing out copies of my images to hang on their walls. I figure they get a decent picture that brings them some enjoyment. I do sell prints on ImageKind, but haven’t gotten any bites yet. Some friends of mine back east used one of my Horsetail Falls for an online project and gave me $20.
Finally, I have a 4 megapixel camera, WAY below what publishers want for magazine use. I can’t sell my images commercially. How am I supposed to get exposure?
Once I get a better camera, I’ll continue to offer my images at the lower end of the resolution scale on Flickr for free download and use.
There are more reasons why I use CC licensing, too many to list here. But I think you get the gist of my drift.
Cheers,
Edie