We’ve all heard about the standard pros and cons of digital photography, but after having lived and breathed it now for nearly 4 years one challenge has been constant. In the age of digital photography it is exceptionally easy to shoot more photos than one is capable of processing and managing.
Invariably when I discuss this with friends the common comment is that digital photographers, particularly those that have never shot film, are not selective enough in their shooting. On some level this is true, but more so I think that digital photographic media, compact flash cards, translate to a bottomless pit. With film photography the expense of film and processing acted as a barrier restricting how many images a photographer could capture. With compact flash the sky is the limit, if you have enough cards or a device to offload the images to.
I consider myself to be selective in what I shoot, but even still I come back with a good number of images. Often an equivalent amount of photos to what I shot with film. The immediacy of digital enables photographers to offload images and move on to the next shoot with out delay. If you shoot regularly as I do this can generate a backlog of images quickly.
Unfortunately moderation is not in the vocabulary of most photographers including myself. The lure of my digital camera to a world full of photographic opportunities is too much to resist. “I’ll get to processing my last shoot during the week” is often a line I tell myself before heading out to my next photo outing. In most cases I’m disciplined enough to follow through. I also do my best to cap how much I shoot and how often I go out shooting.
Most recently I spent nearly a month, which seemed like an eternity, from going out and shooting new material until I processed a few older shoots. Still I never feel like I work my way through all of my material. In fact as of today I have more shoots than I can count that still need my attention to some degree and are what I would consider unfinished. I hate having to deal with loose ends. They add up and I feel tortured as a result. Post-processing all of my outstanding material would likely take months to complete. To go with out shooting for that amount of time would be unbearable. The struggle to find the right balance is a constant battle. In many ways this reflects an external manifestation of my inner battle of self-control. In the world of Freud my “ego” has a challenging time mediating my “id”, which pursues the pleasure of capturing more photographs, and “super-ego”, my conscience which knows what is right. Who would have thought that photography could be so complex and mentally challenging.
[tags]digital photography, photography, post-processing, time management, Freud, self-control[/tags]
Time management is always a tricky balance. Some photographers don’t edit their work very well and end up with 50,000 images on the stock sites which is all fine if you have a staff or just batch processed everything. But for a single stock photographer who shoots a full 16 hour day might end up with several days worth of image processing as a result. Realistically it’s only worth it to process photos that range from “marketable” to “great”. The lesser stuff isn’t really worth processing unless a request comes in for it.
When I went on the SF trip, I didn’t shoot for a month afterwards because I was busy trying to catch up. If I had a full-time job, then I’d likely still be processing images. It was worth it though because hopefully I’ll be able to pay off the trip and make a profit from that trip in the future. It would only take a sale or two to break even.
Pingback: Heavywe.Com » Digital Photography: So Good, It’s Bad
Pingback: Dawsal.Com » Digital Photography: So Good, It’s Bad
It can seem like more fun to shoot than to process, but I guess it’s a matter of relative importance. Personally, I can’t deal with backlogs. It drives me crazy.
I don’t shoot for money, so if there’s a backlog, who cares but myself. Being a Virgo, though, I force myself to deal quickly with my pictures by cataloging them and blogging about them. I run a simultaneous blog (in MS Word) that I prepare for print-on-demand (by converting to PDF) once I’ve reached about 50 pages worth of material. I also like to print my favorite shots and sock them away in a portfolio collection, but I do tend to get backlogged in that area.
I have a feeling you’re not the only one. I keep a “to do” pile of images, and it’s approaching 400. Yet I still don’t feel an urgent rush to get them all done — a lot of them fall out over time as I come to the realization that not everything I shoot is worth spending more time processing.
Richard as you mention the flip-side of this challenge is time management. Knowing what you need, when you need it and planning accordingly is key.
John and Brian indeed being selective at the time of shooting and in post-editing & post-procesing is essential. I dont see this challenge going away. It all comed down to the disciplineof the photographer.
There is another option… Evaluate faster, Process quicker, learn how to pick out the ones with potential at just a glance… Come back to the ones with less potential on a rainy day…
Of course, this is limited by the speed of your computer in this digital age…
Susheel thats pretty much how i operate. Even still with enough subjects to shoot its easy to fall behind. What applications are you finding improve your productivity?
Jim,
That’s because digital photography has a certain faddishness that appeals to the younger people.
http://terrychay.com/blog/article/passing-fad.shtml
Pingback: The Woodwork » Blog Archive » Passing faddishness
Terry nice comic. That made me laugh. As to the fad of Digital Photography it certainly is upon us and frankly thats ok… until it loses steam. Best of luck catching up on your photos and blog entries 🙂
Now that I know about your main blog I’ll be checking in regularly. Thanks for the comment and link.
hmm…how about browsing thru your backlog and pick a few that’s worth the while to process at a time?